Scott Burns Couch Potato Portfolio (50/50)
Scott Burns
In brief
One total U.S. stock fund and one inflation-protected bond fund in equal measure.
Profile sources: Bogleheads WikiOptimized Portfolio
- Published
- Last reviewed
At a glance
2 asset sleeves
Review annually and rebalance when allocations drift materially.
Growth assets
50%
Bonds & reserves
50%
Other diversifiers
0%
Target allocation
What the portfolio holds
Total U.S. stocks
VTIVTI
50%
TIPS
SCHPSCHP
50%
Tickers are liquid U.S.-listed examples, not recommendations or exact historical fund selections.
Allocation sources: Bogleheads WikiOptimized Portfolio
Decision context
Potential advantages and trade-offs
These observations follow from the displayed allocation and implementation. They are not a recommendation or a prediction of future performance.
Potential advantages
- Uses only 2 sleeves, which makes the displayed target allocation straightforward to understand and maintain.
- Combines growth assets with bonds or reserves instead of depending on one broad asset class.
- Publishes explicit target weights, making drift and rebalancing decisions measurable.
Important trade-offs
- The largest sleeve is 50% of the portfolio, so its behavior can dominate the result.
- The displayed equity allocation has no dedicated international sleeve and is exposed to U.S.-market concentration.
- Representative ETF results can differ from the originator's indexes, funds, taxes, fees, and execution.
Portfolio Visualizer
Compare historical performance
Backtest this allocation beside two familiar U.S. equity benchmarks. The comparison starts with $10,000, reinvests dividends, and rebalances annually.
Growth of $10,000
Monthly total returns · maximum available history
Portfolio 1
Scott Burns Couch Potato Portfolio (50/50)
Target allocation from this profile
Portfolio 2
S&P 500
SPY benchmark
Portfolio 3
Nasdaq-100
QQQ benchmark
Portfolio Visualizer opens in a new tab because its site does not support embedded frames. Results begin at the latest common inception date for the selected funds.
Sources and context
Target allocations are educational examples, not personalized advice. Fund availability, taxes, trading costs, account type, time horizon, and capacity for loss can all change the appropriate implementation. Historical diversification does not guarantee future results.
- Implementation referenceLazy portfolios ↗Bogleheads Wiki
- Implementation referenceLazy portfolio allocation library ↗Optimized Portfolio
Sources document the strategy, underlying methodology, or the representative funds used here. ETF tickers are illustrative U.S.-listed implementations and may differ from an originator’s original funds or current model.
